Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Judge rules Gore climate film requires guidance notes
High Court judge Michael Burton's decision follows legal action brought by a father of two last month claiming the former US vice-president's film contained "serious scientific inaccuracies, political propaganda and sentimental mush".
Well now wait a minute. I personally haven't seen the film, but if Global Warming is indeed real, why would Al Gore make a movie that was filled with lies? Why would they fudge the science? The data should speak for itself right?
This to me seems like the same thing you'd expect from Michael Moore. A lick of truth, and a lot of spin and half truths.
But it is funny that a judge has said that it's filled with bullshit. Al's got to be pissed about that.
Travis
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
Have you ever seen a documentary that is flawless???
Give me a break, every day new information comes to us to prove that threis credibility in his documentary.
If you watch History or Discovery on TV, you'l see that they also document irreversible happenings in our climate change and predictions for our future. Like it or not it's here.
Claudius
Give me a break, every day new information comes to us to prove that threis credibility in his documentary.
If you watch History or Discovery on TV, you'l see that they also document irreversible happenings in our climate change and predictions for our future. Like it or not it's here.
Claudius
# posted by 
: October 12, 2007 4:40 PM
: October 12, 2007 4:40 PM
I'm not saying that it has to be flawless, however it DOES have to be at least 90-95% correct to be considered a "documentary". Otherwise it's just an opinion piece.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
