Right Wing Lunatic

So Iran has come out and said that the US is in no position to start a war with Iran. While Iran may think that way, we don't need to be in a position to start a war with Iran. Israel already is making preparations. So unless Iran gets it's collective head out of the sand soon, they may be on the receiving end of an Israeli airstrike.

Let's not forget that Israel has one of the most advanced military's and intelligence gathering operations in the world. There's a reason why people are rightfully nervous. Black market documents that point towards a nuclear weapon, dual purpose equipment, failure to have UN weapons inspectors verify that their nuclear program is peaceful, throwing away chances to have nuclear fuel enriched off site that cannot be weaponized, etc.


Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I have made some minor changes to the site you should know about. First, I have limited the front page to the last 50 posts. This is about a week to a week and a half's worth of posts. It was taking too long for the front page to load, but I wanted everyone to be able to see a bit more than a few day's worth of posts. I have also made it so that it archives a week at a time instead of a month at a time. I am also working on getting a search ready for the site. That should be operational shortly. If you have any questions or issues, please feel free to contact me.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So a bomb factory where bombs were fused with Chlorine gas canisters has been found. Hopefully this is the only one of it's kind and we won't see any more Chlorine gas attacks. It's a pretty horrible way to die.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Many of you have written to me and have some questions, so I thought I would do a quick rundown of how I run things.

I read every email and reply as soon as possible. Sometimes that means I won't reply for a day or two, but I do get to them all.

Your privacy is of the utmost concern. I don't give out email addresses to anyone, and I don't keep your email address. Once I have emailed you a reply, I delete the old email. I have gotten a lot of hate mail as well, I reply to those as well and they fall under the same email policies. No one besides you and I will know your address unless permission is given by both of us.

I don't delete posts under 99% of the circumstances. If you want to debate my personal beliefs and call names and act like a 12 year old, I'm ok with that. However, threats, or any illegal activities will be deleted and if severe enough, reported to the authorities. For example: If you call me a prick and say I'm full of shit, that's fair game. If you threaten that you're going to harm another person or elected official, regardless of political party, I have the moral and legal obligation to report you to the authorities. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Debate is healthy. Your beliefs may not jive with my beliefs, and that's ok. That's what makes America the greatest nation on earth. We have the right to say what we want to who we want about and subject we want. My family has been in this country since almost the beginning. This country is my home and I will defend it and support it until the day I die. I don't expect everyone to understand my position, but know that I'm always looking out for the best interests of this country and ALL of it citizens.

This is my blog. I try to be as absolutely fair about things, but the bottom line is that I'm the one responsible for this blog, so if you don't agree with what I say or do, use your First Amendment rights and go somewhere else. I can't stand whiners and won't change who I am, what I say, or what I do to appease them.

I call it like I see it. I will call a coward a coward, so if it hurts your feelings that I say something, speak up. I won't care, or change my statements, but I will debate you on the reasons why I reach my position. I will also call out people on "my" side of things. If I see a Republican doing wrong, I will point it out. Corruption, stances on issues, etc, will be spoken about. I will talk about issues that might offend you or you consider taboo: Sex, Religion, Politics, and more are all fair game.

Privacy is out the window when you're an elected official...to a degree. As an elected official, you are a public citizen and thus, don't have as much privacy as your ordinary citizen. Therefore, I will talk about things that can influence your decision making process. The fact that you may be gay, wear women's clothing, or cheat on your wife, means squat to me. The fact that you snort cocaine means much much more.

Well I hope that clears up a lot of the questions that you all have about me and this blog. Of course, I'm probably missing some things that you may want to know about, so you may freely email me anytime you'd like and I'll gladly answer any questions or concerns that you may have.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Man, it's been really slow today. Most of the attention is on the Iran nuclear issue and what the UN plans on doing about it. Will they toughen up and sanction Iran further? I'd love that, but the UN's track record says otherwise.

So I've been kicking around a few ideas to expand the site, but some of the things I come up with are out of my technical expertise. If any of you out there have some ideas of what you would like to see on this site, feel free to contact me.


Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

While it is always advisable to go through diplomatic channels, it's very difficult to ignore evidence that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, supporting terrorism, and supporting the insurgency in Iraq. What Prime Minister Blair fails to realize is that Britain and even the US don't have to do anything, just let Israel take care of it. They have one of the most advance weapons and intelligence gathering abilities in the world, so don't think they can't do it if need be.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I wonder if they read my earlier posts about the elect ability of either Obama or Clinton and how their swipes at one another is going to be fodder for Republicans. Nah, I'm probably just delusional again. :) But at least I'm not the only one that has noticed a trend of Democrats infighting about issues. So that begs the question: Do you really think Democrats are right for the Presidency when they have such a horrible track record on various issues?

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I find it very troubling and a bit shady that Texas Governor Perry and 8 other politicians each received $5,000 campaign donations from drug giant Merck just a few days before they all pushed for mandatory vaccinations with a drug that Merck makes. It might be completely legal, but it surely doesn't sound ethical. That's not to say that the drug doesn't work and that it shouldn't be on the list of things that girls might want to have, but something like this puts a dark cloud over the issue.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Finally a politician who doesn't back down when people get upset by comments he makes. Vice President Cheney has said that the Democrat's policy of pulling troops out of Iraq, it would "validate the strategy of Al-Qaeda". Democrats naturally became a bit whiny and got their feelings all hurt because they didn't like the truth. But Cheney came back with: "My statement was that if we adopt the Pelosi policy, is that we will validate the strategy of al Qaeda," Cheney said. "I said it, and I meant it."

No backpedaling, no "I was misquoted", none of the regular bullshit that you hear from politicians when someone gets their fragile feelings all hurt. It's quite refreshing to hear, especially when he fires back at people who compare him and Bush to Hitler.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Well of course he's going to claim that, there's a ton of evidence against him and he knows he's going to jail for a very long time. Plus, the doctor who examined him has one problem: During cross-examination, prosecutor John Shipley pointed to a test administered by Hegarty in which Padilla scored “zero” on the portions indicating post-traumatic stress disorder. Those segments involved questions about flashbacks, nightmares, depression and other symptoms.

“Nothing in this test supports your diagnosis at all, isn’t that correct?” Shipley asked.

“No,” Hegarty replied, noting that the test answers were only one component of her decision.

Seems like he's trying to weasel out of trouble if you ask me.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So the UN Nuclear group, the IAEA has stated the Iran not only has not stopped enrichment, they've sped it up. China and Russia are going to have a hell of a time trying to explain this away. Plus, the report is from the UN, not the US, so no one can claim bias. Keep painting Iran, the corner is right behind you.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Oh just die in a fire already Farrakhan. This guy is a racist, homophobic man who is a perfect example as to what's wrong with Islam today. It's because of people like this that incorrectly stereotype Islam as radical and spew hate, while moderate Islamic folks have to feel the heat for this guy's remarks. So, please hurry up and die Farrakhan, you'll make the world a better place.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

If any of you out there think that we live in a police state, take a look at this and tell me we are. It's simply a matter of fact that Islamic states have draconian laws that are meant to not hurt the feelings of those in power and to suppress the truth.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I didn't create it, but I agree with it. We've done more good in the world than most of the other world's countries combined. We give more aid, more medicine, more time, more defense to other countries than anyone else. Sure, it may sound like chest beating and others may resent us for it, but take a good hard look at the things we've done and tell me that any other country on earth would do the same if we weren't here. Russia? China? none of those countries would do what we do. China's fast becoming a major world economic power and what are they doing for foreign aid? Not nearly as much as we are. They aren't even doing as much as we are as a percentage of their GDP.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So I guess they don't like it when people call it like it is. Vice President Dick Cheney, while agreeably not the most likable guy, stated: "I think if we were to do what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Murtha are suggesting, all we will do is validate the al-Qaida strategy," the vice president told ABC News. "The al-Qaida strategy is to break the will of the American people ... try to persuade us to throw in the towel and come home, and then they win because we quit."

Of course Nancy Pelosi got her feelings all hurt and tried to contact Bush and complain. She was unsuccessful in reaching him. But this raises a more interesting point, does she have the right to be upset even though Cheney is telling the truth? Democrats have compared Bush to Hitler, slammed Republicans at every opportunity and yet, when some truth comes from Republicans, what do they do? They complain. You can't have it both ways Democrats, either you want "the truth" or you get the happy, sunshine version of events. The fact is that insurgents and Al-Qaeda want us to quit. They want to say "See, I told you that Americans were paper tigers. I told you that we can win."

As for Cheney's assertion that the partial British pullout is a sign that things are going well in Iraq, Pelosi said: "If it's going so well, we'd like to withdraw our troops as well." Well do we have soldiers in southern Iraq? The problem areas are Baghdad and a few outlying areas. Where there's no problems, there's no soldiers Nancy. Perhaps if you researched that and not told 1/2 truths Americans would trust Democrats more. There's a reason why Democrats have the reputation of being weak on terrorism and threats against the US.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

And I can prove it. An 81 year old man is now facing child porn charges after a flood burst open his septic tank, revealing a plastic bag with tapes showing him involved in sex acts with children from decades ago. Sometimes you wonder if bad people ever get their comeuppance, now you know. :)

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Paul E. Cortez has pleaded guilty to his role in the rape and murder of a 14 year old Iraqi girl and her family. Mr. Cortez has unfortunately brought shame and dishonor to his fellow soldiers and to his uniform. I say Mr. Cortez instead of Pfc. Cortez because he is being dishonorably discharged and does not deserve the title of any rank as a US soldier.

I'll be the first to defend a soldiers decision when it comes to taking a life. A split second is all you have to decide whether you want to fire upon a person. Sometimes you're right, sometimes you're wrong. When you're wrong, it can tear at your soul, but it's completely understandable when it's a "you or me" situation. The rape and murder of a civilian family is not something that can be "understood". Unfortunately, Mr. Cortez decided with some of his fellow soldiers that they would do such an act. They will pay for that act for the rest of their lives, even if they eventually get released from prison.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Apparently, the recent toxic gas explosion that killed 6 people wasn't the first, it was just the biggest body count. So is this what Murtha was talking about when he said that if we leave, the Iraqi's will have the insurgents gone "the minute we leave"? I'm willing to bet that we have guys already in chemical plants taking a look around to find those responsible, but it is an effective way to spread terror to civilians.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Iran has really backed itself into a corner and made it's allies have to make choices that will drive a wedge between them. The IAEA report is coming out soon, and there's no doubt that it will detail that the Iranian's nuclear program can't be found to be confirmed fully peaceful. Tougher sanctions must result in the UN. Otherwise, what's the point? The Chinese and the Russians will look weak on the international stage if they decide that they don't want to back tougher sanctions.

Iran has fully admitted that they haven't stopped enrichment, which was one of the requirements for the tougher sanctions that everyone agreed to. So, stand up and be responsible and impose those sanctions.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

They do just about everything but name names. I would be very shocked if they weren't brought up on charges for this. For example:

In real life, the chief pilot is 52, drives a Toyota Previa minivan and keeps a collection of model trains in a glass display case near a large bubbling aquarium in his living room. Federal aviation records show he is rated to fly seven kinds of aircraft as long as he wears his glasses.

That narrows it down pretty significantly if you ask me. A simple search of the publicly available records will show you who this person is. Plus, what if the LA Times got this person wrong? They could be endangering the lives of 3 people and can get their butts royally sued for it. Is it another "Valerie Plame" case? Hard to say, but I will say that they are treading a very fine line that can lead to some serious criminal charges.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Wow, get a load of this:

"It's not preppies, 'cause I'm a preppie myself. I just don't like homosexuals. If you ask me, they're all homosexuals in the Pudding. Hey, I was glad when that Pudding homosexual got killed in Philadelphia."
Mr. Franken, a 1973 graduate of Harvard, was referring to Harvard's Hasty Pudding theatrical club.
Those remarks were made back in 1976 when Mr. Franken, like former Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen and others, was a careless young man blurting insults that he now lives to regret.

We've all made stupid comments when we were younger, myself included. But if you plan on getting into public office, you'd better be much more squeaky clean then Franken. Plus, if hatred isn't in your heart, it doesn't matter what age you are, that hatred is there.


Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So the Federal budget is doing so well and is revenue is so strong, were it to continue in this way, we would have a surplus within a year.

Already, the federal deficit is shrinking toward about half the size that it has averaged since 1970, when analyzed as a percentage of gross domestic product.

We're not out of the woods yet, but the Congressional Budget Office shows a surplus by the year 2012. Funny how you don't hear about that on the evening news. I wonder why?

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So now Barack is stating that, even without the evidence that the Senate had in front of it at the time, if he had been in the Senate, "I think I would have voted no.”

Of course he would have said no. That's what's popular right now. Of course he would have said no, he doesn't want to go to war with anyone, regardless of who it is, unless we're sitting in a pile of rubble. This statement lets you peer into his thought process on what it takes to secure this nation against threats, and he's failed miserably at that test.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Now the real fireworks can begin. Edwards, Clinton and Obama are all going to rip each other apart and I'm willing to bet that Rudy Guiliani will easily win in 08 if he decides to run. From the article: "We aren’t going to get in the middle of a disagreement between the Clintons and someone who was once one of their biggest supporters. It is ironic that the Clintons had no problem with David Geffen when was raising them $18 million and sleeping at their invitation in the Lincoln bedroom. It is also ironic that Senator Clinton lavished praise on Monday and is fully willing to accept today the support of South Carolina State Sen. Robert Ford, who said if Barack Obama were to win the nomination, he would drag down the rest of the Democratic Party because ’he's black.’"

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I can't believe that a law like this even needs to be put into place, especially in Texas. But it basically states if you feel threatened, you have the right to shoot first without having to retreat. What bothers me is that it is still theoretically possible for you to shoot someone legally, and then be arrested, searched, and then have the charges dropped eventually when it's found you were in the legal right. Now you have to deal with attorney fees, putting your things back after the police have confiscated them and more.

But this is Texas. Everyone has a gun. There shouldn't need to be a second thought on if someone shoots another legally. Yes, there are going to be cases where the question of legality comes into play, but once it's found out that you did it right, then you should be free to go, attorney fee's waived, and your guns returned to you if they were confiscated right away.

You notice we don't have as much trouble anymore on airlines? People know that there's an armed air marshall on the flight somewhere. Criminals don't like hard targets. They often will think twice if they know that someone in the room has a gun and will shoot back.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Can any of these guys be trusted at all? First off, this unnamed official states that Iran doesn't want conflict and that they are offering: "is an Iranian pledge to refine uranium no higher than the 4-5 percent level, well below the 80 percent threshold needed for nuclear bombs."

What's to prevent them from ramping up the refinement process once world attention goes away? Why not use the equipment that can only be used for peaceful purposes? Why not have enrichment done in a neutral country so it can't be refined further? Why the talk of "showing of strength"?

You can't make a statement like "We do not want to have to prove that we are strong. Our nuclear program is not to show the U.S. we are strong. It is because of our previous centuries of threats and invasions," and honestly expect us to believe that you're only wanting electricity. It's bullshit and everyone knows it.

You want to be "natural allies"? Here's a small bullet list of things that need to happen, on our side and yours. First up, your side:

Stop support of terrorist organizations, including Hamas, Hizbollah, and others.

Stop supporting insurgents in Iraq.

Stop uranium enrichment at your nuclear plants and allow enrichment at an agreed upon neutral third countries location.

Stop naval exercises bent on provoking a military response.

Hand over all Al-Qaeda suspects currently in custody

Share intelligence on where Al-Qaeda suspects might be.

Stop the almost daily "Death To America" chants in mosques.

Stop teaching that children should be strapped with bombs and sent off into bakeries.

Stop teaching hate towards any group.

I'm sure I'm missing a few items, but those are the biggies.

Out list:

Support a true peace agreement with Israel and the Palestinians.

Tone down rhetoric about Iran.

Hand over any suspected militants bent against Iran (if any)

Open trade and normal relations

I'm sure there's more demands that Iran has, but until Iran stops those main arguments, they will always be looking over their shoulders wondering what we or the Israeli's might do.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

While this story is about the Italian Prime Minister resigning, the very last comment paints a perfect portrait about those on the left and how they feel about war, any war, regardless of circumstances. But one leftist senator announced he would resign rather than vote for D'Alema's motion. "I am against the war in Afghanistan"

Nevermind the war in Afghanistan began when we were attacked first. Nevermind that it started because the Taliban wouldn't hand over Osama Bin Laden. Nevermind we had 3,000 people dead. It's this guy's personal beliefs that war is never justified, regardless of what happens. But he'll be the first to cry out for our help if someone else comes knocking on his door.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Of course, this will get politicized. Ted Kennedy is the first to seize upon this bit of news, but he fails to mention the fact that there's no real problems in southern Iraq, so there's no reason why the Iraqi's can't take over that section of the country and for British troops to start coming home. But of course, you come to expect that kind of behavior from Democrats don't you?

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Oh how I love it when politicians start to backtrack on words they've said. Now John Edwards is backtracking on his recent comment of Israel bombing Iran is the biggest short term threat to world peace. Now he's stating, through his spokesman that the article was wrong and that Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon is the greatest threat.

This is classic "what he's really thinking". He said what he meant in the beginning and now with the minor backlash and the fierce competition that he's facing with other Democrats, they are now in damage control. Can you really trust what this guy can do for the country when it comes to threats, especially ones in the Middle East? Israel is our fiercest ally, and they are smack dab in the middle of people who hate us, so guess what might be a good idea John? How about not calling them the greatest short term threat to peace when they have every right to defend themselves from a nutjob trying to acquire nuclear weapons and has made direct threats?? Idiot.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I can't even believe this is really an issue. If you go mountain climbing, the responsible thing to do would be to carry an electronic beacon. There are actually people opposed to this. You can rent a GPS unit at the base of the mountain for less then $10. $10 and a cell call could have you extracted from trouble in only a few hours. This can and will save lives and money so that rescuers aren't combing over a rough terrain looking for you.

So if people are opposed to it, I have a solution: pay for the costs of your rescue. That would sober a lot of people up real quick. Rescues easily cost upwards of $50,000 or more. You have people's wages, helicopter maintenance, fuel, and other equipment and related costs. Simply have a law that states: if you're going mountain climbing, you must carry a GPS or electronic beacon. If you don't, you'll be required to pay for the rescue efforts. Simple as that.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So a new bi-partisan poll came out and it shows that Democrats are either exaggerating or are dead wrong on their position about troops in Iraq. An interesting statistic: only 17% said we should remove our troops immediately. 17%.

By a 53 percent - 46 percent margin, respondents surveyed said that Democrats are going too far, too fast in pressing the President to withdraw troops from Iraq.

By identical 57 percent - 41 percent margins, voters agreed with these statements: I support finishing the job in Iraq, that is, keeping the troops there until the Iraqi government can maintain control and provide security and the Iraqi war is a key part of the global war on terrorism.

Also, by a 56 percent - 43 percent margin, voters agreed that even if they have concerns about his war policies, Americans should stand behind the President in Iraq because we are at war.

While the survey shows voters believe (60 percent- 34 percent) that Iraq will never become a stable democracy, they still disagree that victory in Iraq (creating a young, but stable democracy and reducing the threat of terrorism at home) is no longer possible. Fifty-three percent say it's still possible, while 43 percent disagree.

By a wide 74 percent - 25 percent margin, voters disagree with the notion that "I don't really care what happens in Iraq after the U.S. leaves, I just want the troops brought home."

When asked which statement best describes their position on the Iraq War, voters are evenly divided (50 percent - 49 percent) between positions of "doing whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country," and positions that call for immediate withdrawal or a strict timetable.

27 percent said "the Iraq war is the front line in the battle against terrorism and our troops should stay there and do whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country."

23 percent said "while I don't agree that the U.S. should be in the war, our troops should stay there and do whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country."

32 percent said "whether Iraq is stable or not, the U.S. should set and hold to a strict timetable for withdrawing troops."

17 percent said "the U.S. should immediately withdraw its troops from Iraq."

Quite interesting. Makes you wonder what else the Democrats are trying to muster up.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So the charges have been dropped against the man who chased down a gas thief and held him with a shotgun. It's sad that charges were brought to begin with, but it's good that it all worked out in the end.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

You'll hear many people tout this as a defeat for Bush and America. Quite the opposite. We've said for a long time, "we will stand down when Iraqi's stand up". This is just a case of that happening. What insurgents don't realize is that if they stopped fighting, we'd have no reason to be there. Once the new Iraqi government is in place and security forces are ready to go, there's no reason for us to stay. But they don't see things long term, which is yet another reason why you'll see people comparing terrorist and Democratic views often, because most times, you'll see there are striking similarities.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So OJ's victims are entitled to his past royalty earnings, including the "If I did it" book. Well he doesn't have to worry about "If he did it" because they will be taking his money because he really did do it.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Republican John Murtha has been quite vocal lately on his intentions on cutting funding for additional troops into Iraq. I know Murtha is full of shit and what he's doing is demoralizing our troops who are hopeful for reinforcements and getting Iraq stabilized. You know it too, and now Lt. Col. Francona is pointing it out with a well thought out article.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

This is quite an interesting case. The only reasoning I can come up with is perhaps he thought he could blend in with people and perhaps say "I donate to the Republican party, I can't be a terrorist". However, if true, 95 years in jail isn't long enough. Traitors need to be shot and have it broadcast via pay per view.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Well duh. Just because he's urging it, doesn't mean that it hasn't been happening already. We need people who can speak just about any language on earth. Each one of those people will be valuable intelligence gathering tools to help fight off threats against the US. What boggles my mind is the fact that an article even needs to be written about Bush's recommendations. We already know what needs to be done.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

A very interesting article on how to treat soldiers with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I know of one particular soldier in my own personal life that was showing signs of PTSD when he came home on leave from Afghanistan. His wife, whom I worked with, was concerned about his behavior. She was also concerned about the time that he had back home was very short and that she wanted him to get counseling, but that would take longer then the time they had allowed. She was nervous he might get worse and that she had heard horror stories about soldiers who turn violent against their wives/girlfriends/children and didn't want that to happen to her.

So I came up with a novel approach. I told her to give him the 4 "warms" while he was at home. A warm bed, a warm shower, a warm meal, and a warm woman. All the creature comforts a man could ask for. Let him know what he's missing when he leaves so that he knows that he has something special to come home to. Now this isn't a "fix all" for everyone. There's going to be guy's who need real help, but I offered this solution to her as a temporary fix.

So, when he returned home, he found that he had a new set of comfortable sheets and comforter, the shower had all of the usual comforts, she made him a steak and potato dinner, and then she had sex with him. That was the first time they had any quality time like that together in over a year. I didn't expect her to do all of these things to the letter, but he came into my office the day after and said "What the hell did you tell my wife? She was an angel last night to me and then said you were responsible for it" I let him know that because of the talks I had had with him and her and his possible PTSD, that she should be a bit extra nice and told him of the 4 "warms". He had a smile on his face for the rest of the day.

He did let me know that he did have nightmares from time to time, but everyone does. I told him about how easy it is for things to get ugly if they argue, so take a step back if it ever came to that so things wouldn't get violent. He was extraordinarily happy that someone took the time to make sure that he was ok and that his home life was being looked after while he was gone. He asked me what he could do to repay me. My response: Bring back Bin Laden's head in a box. Capture or kill as many Al-Qaeda as possible. He's already doing more then enough to make sure that my family and I are safe from bad guys, the least I can do is make sure that his life is a happy one as well.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Wow, I can't believe a guy would be that stupid over a traffic ticket. To actively spam from your place of work and insinuate that the cop who gave you the traffic ticket is a homosexual pedophile? Now that officer is suing the guy claiming libel. I hope if everything in the article is true, that the cop gets everything this guy owns. Cops get shot at, stabbed, spit on, and are then expected to catch the bad guys and go home. When they have to deal with idiots like this, they deserve to smack the guy down in court.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Yes, you have the right to protest anything you'd like. However, when you put someone out of business for that right, don't be surprised if you don't get your ass sued into oblivion. That's the route I would take against these protesters. Sue for harassment, loss of business, intimidation, and more. Welcome to the other side of the coin.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

This is why we search women in burqa's. This is also what I meant when I say that terrorists don't adhere to the rules of war and the Geneva Conventions and thus, why they are not allowed to have those rights.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So they offer to shut down their nuclear enrichment program if we shut down ours? That's a bullshit offer and they know it. What's worse is that the Iranian President had the nerve to state: "We have never been after confrontation and tension. We have always been for dialogue but dialogue under fair conditions."

Yet another bullshit lie. Provoking Israel and western countries, stating that the US will fall like the Soviet Union did, all those aren't confrontational and create tension? The only thing that will get this guys attention is a bunker buster bomb. We've already stated that if it's found that they are trying to get a nuclear weapon or if it is directly traced to the heads of Iran that they are supporting the insurgency in Iraq, we will attack, and rightfully so.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Closing arguments are set for today in the CIA leak case against "Scooter" Libby. While I haven't followed the case as closely as I should have, ANYONE who discloses a CIA employee should be tried for treason. CIA employees have enough to deal with on their plate, they certainly don't need the aggravation and possible retaliation over their cover being blown.

While the article states that Libby wasn't the source for Robert Novak's outing of the CIA operative, I want to know who was.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So now they are trying to use Chlorine gas in attacks. While it did kill a few people and injure many more, this should be squashed as quickly as possible. They are testing to see what chemicals and other agents are best for killing mass amounts of people. This is only a test run, you'll see larger scale attacks or other chemicals used if these people aren't found and killed or captures quickly.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So apparently people need to be told that inhaling smoke every day for years is bad for their health. Then they have the nerve to sue because they get ill or die from it. If you smoke, that's your business, however if you think you should be able to sue a company because you smoked and got cancer, you're an idiot. Everyone on the planet knows that smoking can, and does lead to cancer and other serious illnesses. Just be a bit more personally responsible and you'll make the world a better place. I love a great hamburger, but you won't see me suing Wendy's because I get fat and have a heart attack. Why? Because they aren't forcing me to eat a burger. Don't want to smoke? Quit. Millions of people have quit before you, so you can't tell me it can't be done.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

While they state that they no longer have jurisdiction over the matter, I do agree that we can't allow "enemy combatants" access to civilian courts. Here's why: Say we have a spy within Al-Qaeda's network that's detailing upcoming plots. If we were to try the detainees in civilian court, we would have to detail what intelligence we have and how we got it. While that's perfectly fine in regular criminal trials, it's quite different when it comes to terrorists.

The Geneva Conventions were designed to protect soldiers of sovereign nations from abuse and spelled out the rules of war between nations. When a person takes up arms against a nation and does not adhere to the Geneva Conventions, they are not protected by those same rights. For example, if you are a soldier with say, Brazil, you must wear a uniform that points you out as a member of the Brazilian military. (Sorry Brazil, nothing against, you, I just picked a random country). You must also not involve civilians. You cannot use religious grounds for a base of attacks or weapons storage or that becomes a legitimate military target. Al-Qaeda does none of these things. Therefore they are not protected by the Geneva Conventions. Sure, they do deserve to be free from "abuse", but that doesn't mean that their time spent in our custody needs to be comfortable or even observe religious differences. The fact that we even provide them with religiously sensitive meals shows we're doing a better job then most people think.

Make no mistake, these people will kill you and everyone around you if given the chance. There's even been people found on the battlefield after we've released them. So you'll have to excuse me if I could give a rats ass less about their "plight". When they start observing the Geneva Conventions, THEN they deserve to be protected by those rights.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Well good for them. What's even better is that Russia has pushed them even further to wanting to be a part of the missile defense shield because of Russian statements. "Russia's strategic forces commander, General Nikolai Solovtsov, said on Monday that Russia would be capable of firing missiles at the Czech Republic and Poland if the ex-communist states agreed to host the U.S. defense system."

Good going idiots, threaten them with missiles. What do you think they would want to do about that? Hmm...perhaps be a part of the missile defense shield? Just a thought.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

So it appears that Russia is a bit unnerved because Iran hasn't paid them for the nuclear reactor. Iran says they have. Perhaps this is Russia's way of backing out of the nuclear deal while still saving face on the international stage? Or this could be a way for Russia to make sure the IAEA signs off on the Iranian nuclear program before they hand over 100 tons of partially enriched uranium.

I don't know about you, but the Russian/Iranian nuclear deal has me wanting to keep a special eye on it.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

I've never been much of a country music fan, but this guy nails it right on the head. He's stating what I have been for the past few months about Democrats and their bullshit, enemy aid ways. Hopefully, voters will see through this stuff that Democrats are trying to pull and vote them out at the next election. Here's the text of what he said:

An Open Letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi

Dear Sir and Madam,

You have said often enough that you don't believe in the war in Iraq and
that you want to bring the troops home. Yet all you do is talk and sign
non-binding resolutions which only goes to show that you really don't mean
what you say about ending the war or that you're just playing political
games and in doing so giving aid and comfort to a dedicated enemy.

Now if you're serious about ending the war you have the means and the votes to do just that. Simply cut off the funding for the troops, bring them all home and the American people can transfer the deed to this war and the
ramifications of what you do to the Democrat party and you can live with the results.

You say you support the troops, but that has to be a lie. If you supported
them and you truly think the war is wrong, you'd bring them home or either
dispense with the poisonous rhetoric and get in behind them and help them
get the job done.

You can't have it both ways. If you support the troops do something. Your
party won a majority in both houses, so you have control so take the
responsibility.

Of course, I think you should remember that when the terrorists follow us
home from Iraq and start their attacks on American soil it's too late, so
you'd better have a plan to deal with it. Do you have a plan?

And if Iran goes into Iraq and makes it a staging ground for Al Qaida to
plan and carry out attacks all over the western world you'll need to deal
with that. Do you have a plan?

And if Iran decides to go into Kuwait and cut off the oil flow from the
Persian Gulf, you'll need a way to make up for the shortfall. Do you have a
plan?

The world would look at us as a country that has not finished a commitment to war since 1945. Do you have a plan for dealing with that?

The purpose of this letter is to call your bluff. I don't believe you have
the guts to do anything but talk and talk is cheap. Oh you have no shortage of words but I seriously doubt the amount of backbone you have.

Do you really think that signing a non binding resolution is really fooling
anybody into thinking you're anything less than career politicians trying to tip the scales of the O08 Presidential Election.

What you're doing is silly and dangerous. If you really don't like what's
going on, change it, do something about it. You've got the power but have
you got the guts?

Pray for our troops.

What do you think?

God Bless America
Charlie Daniels
February 16, 2007

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Excuse me if I don't shed a tear for a guy who laughed when he described how it took two blows to behead a girl. He had to have known that his actions would lead to the deaths of innocent people. It's all bullshit meant to sway people from the real truth: that he's an Islamic militant who deserves to die for his crimes.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

News flash, it's not your fucking business. So a child likes watching the HBO special "Band Of Brothers" and wants to have a party based upon that? Where's the issue? There's a ton of people "outraged" by it, but they won't spank their kids when they get out of line. What I do like about it is the veterans who came and spoke about war and the children didn't seem interested in the gory parts of war, they just wanted to know about being a soldier. Children are more intelligent then we give them credit for, and for parents to be "outraged" tells me more about the parents then it does about their parenting skill.

Would those parents have a problem with a Barbie party? A Yu Gi Oh party? I doubt it.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

You're going to have good times with bad, and unfortunately, 63 people had to die for the "bad" times. However, sooner or later the Iraqi people will start getting tired of this and start turning in terrorists or reporting suspicious activity more and more. It will take time, but mark my words, if Democrats don't get their way of pulling our guys out of there, we'll see a turn around.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

You know, Russian President Putin does like to blow a lot of hot air about how Russia is now going to become this great nation and everything will crumble around us if we don't be nice to them. For example:

Make no mistake, though. Putin delivered a message, and the White House heard it loud and clear. It goes something like this: in the 1990s, America pushed us around. On NATO expansion, we asked you to consider our national interests. You answered with an advance into former Soviet territory in Eastern Europe. You spoke of energy partnership yet built new pipelines to bypass our territory. Western companies took advantage of our economic troubles to buy access to our natural resources at cut-rate prices.

Well duh, it's called capitalism. We did speak of energy partnerships, and what do you do? You raise prices and blackmail eastern Europe by shutting off the supply of energy. Proves us right doesn't it?

We took advantage of your economic troubles? You could have said no to private companies when they approached you. You had the right to ask for higher prices, yet you didn't. You signed the contracts and now you have to live with them. It's the same as when you buy a house at a high interest rate. No one was putting a gun to your head when you signed the papers, so if you don't like the deal, tough.

Yes, they have their own problems with Chechen terrorists and I think we should help them with that problem, but if they think we have to be nice to them after all the badmouthing we get from them throughout the years, they should think again.

America is tired of being the whipping boy for the world's problems. It's time we made other countries deal with their own problems and let them feel what it's like to be without our help.

Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com

Wow, I couldn't have asked for a better present. Ok, we all remember William Jefferson, the guy under investigation for bribery. The one that was bribed with $100,000 and $90,000 of which was found in his freezer. So Nancy Pelosi who wants to be shown as running the "most ethical Congress in history" strips him of his position on a tax committee.

So what does she turn around and do? She puts him on a committed for homeland security.

"It sends a terrible